TARS Robotics

“TacForeSight achieves 86.7% average recovery success under active perturbations, versus near-zero for most competing approaches.”

“Under these conditions, the performance gap between TacForeSight and baselines is enormous: competing methods score 0–65% while TacForeSight achieves 85–90% across all three perturbation types (Table I).”

“recovery demonstrations in which external disturbances are introduced during task execution, requiring the demonstrator to re-establish stable contact (Section IV-B 2).”

“Xian Nie — TARS Robotics / Shanghai Jiao Tong University — Equal first author with dual industrial-academic affiliation.”